Short Answer (2025): China still holds a conditional cost edge—most clearly on two-piece Surlyn at ≥10–20k units with standard packaging and sea freight to the US/EU. For Tour-grade multi-layer urethane, Thailand leads on consistency at a higher EXW, while Vietnam often sits in between on cost/origin.
What’s the short answer in 2025—does China still have a cost edge?
Yes—conditionally. For two-piece Surlyn at 10k–20k units with standard specs and sea freight, China is usually the lowest on unit EXW and the most flexible on MOQ and inserts. For Tour-grade multi-layer urethane, Thailand’s process maturity and consistency justify higher EXW; Vietnam is in between, helped by origin/tariff and rising capacity.
| SKU Type | Volume (pcs) | Mode | Verdict (Typical) | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-piece Surlyn | 10k | Sea | China | Lowest EXW, friendly MOQ, quick inserts |
| 2-piece Surlyn | 20k | Sea | China | Scale + packaging ecosystem |
| 2-piece Surlyn | 10k | Air | China / Vietnam (tie) | Air erodes EXW gap; check duty/origin |
| 3-layer Urethane | 10k | Sea | Thailand / Vietnam | Tour-grade yield and consistency |
| 3-layer Urethane | 20k | Sea | Thailand | Mature lines, tighter Compression/Tolerance/Performance (CTP) |
| 3-layer Urethane | 10–20k | Air | Thailand (if premium) | Fewer rework risks at speed |
The quick formula for total landed cost (EXW + freight + duty + packaging + yield/scrap + time risk)
Lead with the total landed cost—not EXW. A practical estimator is: Landed ≈ EXW × (1 + inland/port %) + freight/box + duty + VAT + risk buffer. Add yield/scrap if your SKU has tight tolerances (e.g., urethane cover finish) or if you’re pushing short lead times where rework is costly. Keep inputs simple: choose a midpoint EXW, set inland/port at 2–4% (US), plug ocean at $0.10–0.25/box for full-container economies, and look up HS 950632 duty** by origin at PO stage.
Three triggers that flip the result (tooling, batch size, air vs sea)
Three variables routinely reverse “cheapest EXW wins”: (1) New tooling (fresh dimple pattern or core mold adds weeks and setup amortization), (2) Batch size (10k vs 50k shifts overhead allocation and run-time), and (3) Air vs sea (urgent launches push top-up air that erases EXW gaps). If two quotes are within $0.05/ball, logistics and duty often determine the winner—especially for EU-bound flows where ~2.7–4.7% duty applies.
✔ True — Lower EXW ≠ lowest landed cost
Air surcharges, duty, and yield can offset a $0.05–0.10/ball EXW advantage, especially on fast replenishment.
✘ False — “The cheapest quote always wins”
The buyer wins by framing decisions on landed cost and time-risk, not EXW alone.
How do China, Thailand, and Vietnam split product focus and export scale?
China focuses on 2-piece Surlyn and mid-range 3-layer urethane; Thailand concentrates on Tour-grade multi-layer urethane (Titleist/Bridgestone clusters); Vietnam is smaller but rising in mid-to-high OEM and transfer orders. 2024 exports track steady-to-slightly-up from 2023 baselines across all three.
Product focus by country (value proposition & capacity logic)
China excels in 2-piece Surlyn with MOQ flexibility and supports 3-layer urethane for mainstream performance. Dense supplier networks around inks, clearcoats, and boxes shorten setup time and favor inserts. Thailand is anchored by Tour-grade urethane, where yield and consistency dominate economics; even with higher EXW, predictable lot-to-lot performance lowers after-sales risk. Vietnam scales mid-to-high OEM with origin/tariff upsides in EU-bound corridors and competitive management overhead.
Main destinations (US, JP, EU, KR/UK/CA)
All three ship primarily to the US, Japan, EU, with Korea, UK, and Canada as important second-tier destinations. Choice among CN/VN/TH is sensitive to duty/origin (EU) and time-risk for March–August inserts. Many brands dual-source to blunt schedule shocks and optimize landed cost by corridor.

| Country | Focused Categories | 2023 Official ($ / Units) | 2024 Inferred ($ / Units) |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 2-piece Surlyn; some 3-layer PU | $116.9M / 286.2M pcs | $122.5M / 295.0M pcs |
| Thailand | Multi-layer PU (Tour grade) | $169.0M / 56.0M pcs | $170.0M / 55.0M pcs |
| Vietnam | Rising mid-to-high OEM | $45.2M / 11.0M pcs | $45.0M / 10.0M pcs |
✔ True — “Bigger value ≠ more units”
Thailand’s premium mix yields higher $ value on far fewer units versus China’s large-run 2-piece volumes.
✘ False — “Highest $ exporter ships the most balls”
Average selling price (ASP) and product mix drive the divergence.
What are EXW price ranges and lead times at 20k units for 2-piece vs 3-piece?
At 20k pcs, two-piece Surlyn EXW: China $0.55–0.75, Vietnam $0.60–0.85, Thailand $0.65–0.90. For three-layer urethane: China $1.45–1.90, Vietnam $1.60–2.20, Thailand $1.70–2.40. Lead times (2-piece / 3-layer): China 25–40d / 45–70d; Vietnam 35–55d / 55–85d; Thailand 35–60d / 55–90d.
Assumptions—white balls, standard print, no new dimple molds, standard QA
Baseline assumes white balls, 1–2 color pad print, no new dimple tooling, and standard QA. Urethane lines assume conventional clearcoat and Compression/Tolerance/Performance (CTP) targets appropriate to mainstream retail. Colored covers, matte finishes, dual coats, or strict Tour-level tolerances will alter cycle time, scrap risk, and per-unit pricing. If you need a new dimple pattern, add 2–4 w** for tooling and first articles.

Yield/consistency sensitivity—why Tour-grade favors Thailand despite higher EXW
Tour-grade urethane rewards stable yields, reproducible compression, and cover uniformity. Thailand’s cluster has mature lines and tight process controls, reducing rework/holdbacks. Even with a higher EXW, predictable performance lowers lifetime cost via fewer returns and steadier reviews. If your brand promise hinges on feel and flight, those operational advantages matter more than a $0.05–0.10/ball delta.
Peak season uplift and insert-order feasibility (China more flexible)
From March to August, all regions feel pressure. China offers better insert feasibility thanks to more lines and nearby accessory ecosystems (inks, plates, boxes). Vietnam and Thailand are stable but tighter on windows—especially Tour lines in Thailand, where changeovers are booked far ahead.
Caption: EXW & lead time (20k pcs; EXW; baseline assumptions)
| Country | 2-piece Surlyn ($/pc) | Lead Time (d) | 3-layer Urethane ($/pc) | Lead Time (d) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 0.55–0.75 | 25–40 | 1.45–1.90 | 45–70 | High elasticity; inserts feasible |
| Vietnam | 0.60–0.85 | 35–55 | 1.60–2.20 | 55–85 | Lines expanding; US/EU origin favorable |
| Thailand | 0.65–0.90 | 35–60 | 1.70–2.40 | 55–90 | Tour-grade maturity; high consistency |
✔ True — “Cheapest quote” can lose on yield and speed
A $0.05/ball difference is offset quickly by a single air-lift or a batch rework.
✘ False — “Price sheet ends the analysis”
Compare lead-time reliability and yield targets line-by-line, especially for urethane.
How much does a 12-ball color box cost at 1,000 boxes, and how fast?
For 12-ball color boxes (1,000 box, EXW) with E/F single-wall insert and 157g coated paper, 4C + matte lamination: China $0.28–0.45 in 10–18d; Vietnam $0.32–0.50 in 12–20d; Thailand $0.35–0.55 in 12–22d.
Spec baseline & options (spot UV, foil, emboss) and plate fees
The baseline spec remains the best value for golf ball packaging 12 pack: E/F flute insert + 157g C2S, 4C outside, matte lamination. Expect $50–120 per plate; spot UV, foil, or emboss add cost and time. China’s broad print ecosystem generally shortens prepress and make-ready, which matters for quick refreshes or short promo windows. Keep dielines and ink limits identical across CN/VN/TH to isolate true cost.
Why small runs in VN/TH cost more (paper price, make-ready, labor)
Vietnam and Thailand deliver quality, but paper pricing, short-run make-ready, and labor push up small-lot cost. That’s why 1,000 box runs often remain most competitive in China, particularly when you value fast plate changes during seasonal promotions. If you must print outside China, consider regional prepress with cross-border kitting.
Caption: Color box cost & lead time (1,000 box; EXW; standard spec)
| Country | Color Box $/box (1,000) | Lead Time (d) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 0.28–0.45 | 10–18 | $50–120/plate; lamination/spot-UV extra |
| Vietnam | 0.32–0.50 | 12–20 | Higher paper/labor; small runs pricier |
| Thailand | 0.35–0.55 | 12–22 | Often print in CN/VN then cross-border |
✔ True — Box parity ≠ system parity
Similar box quotes can mask slower artwork, plates, and kitting upstream, adding days to first-ship.
✘ False — “VN/TH boxes are always cheaper”
Spec, run size, and ecosystem density keep China faster and often cheaper at 1k boxes.
What’s the per-box EXW total for 12 balls—and what’s the verdict?
Quantified verdict: China is ~8–12% lower on 2-piece per-box EXW in typical 20k scenarios, with Thailand leading Tour-grade quality at higher cost and Vietnam balancing origin/tariff benefits.
Using midpoints, China tends to be lowest on 2-piece Surlyn per-box EXW and competitive on 3-layer urethane; Thailand leads Tour-grade quality at higher cost; Vietnam balances cost with origin/tariff upside for certain corridors.
Show the math—2-piece vs 3-layer per-box EXW (ball cost × 12 + box)
For a quick check, compute (ball EXW × 12 + box EXW). A $0.05/ball delta becomes $0.60/box**—$600 per 1,000 box** and $3,000 per 5,000 box**—before freight/duty. When a promotion hinges on free shipping or a MAP threshold, this $0.60** swing often decides whether the SKU clears contribution margin.
Sensitivity—±$0.05/pc shifts per-box by ±$0.60
Keep a ±$0.05/pc** sensitivity in your model. On promotional SKUs with tight margins, this swing funds retailer rebates or protects sell-in pricing. If you are bidding national retail with laddered endcaps, model per-box impact for 20k/50k/100k** to align commitments with EXW breaks.
Where duty/origin flips EU-bound orders
For EU-bound shipments (HS 950632 duty EU often ~2.7–4.7% plus VAT), Vietnam/Thailand can close the gap if EXW sits within $0.05–0.08/pc** of China—especially when your box spec is standard and sea transit is booked early. The smaller the EXW gap, the more origin and documentation** decide the result.
Caption: Per-box EXW math (12 balls; midpoints; lead time in d)
| Country | 2-piece Surlyn ($/box) | Lead Time (d) | 3-layer Urethane ($/box) | Lead Time (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | (0.65×12+0.36) ≈ $8.16 | 30–45 | (1.70×12+0.36) ≈ $20.76 | 55–75 |
| Vietnam | (0.72×12+0.41) ≈ $9.05 | 40–60 | (1.90×12+0.41) ≈ $23.21 | 60–90 |
| Thailand | (0.78×12+0.45) ≈ $9.81 | 40–65 | (2.05×12+0.45) ≈ $25.05 | 60–95 |
✔ True — EU duty can flip close quotes
When EXW gaps are within ~$0.05–0.08/pc, **~2.7–4.7%** EU duty plus VAT may move the landed-cost winner away from the lowest EXW.
✘ False — “Lowest EXW always stays lowest after duty”
Always calculate the duty line by **origin** and confirm at PO time.
How to estimate landed cost quickly (US/EU) and not be misled by EXW?
Use a simple formula: Landed ≈ EXW×(1+inland/port %) + freight/box + duty + VAT. For US sea freight at ≥3,000 box, assume inland/port 2–4% of EXW, ocean $0.10–0.25/box**, US MFN duty 0% (HS 950632); EU duty often ~2.7–4.7% plus VAT.**
Sea vs air break-even for golf balls (box-level heuristic)
If time-to-shelf can tolerate +3–5 w**, sea wins decisively for 12-ball SKUs. If your promo date or MAP window demands earlier arrival and forecast error is high, plan partial air and model how many box can fly before you erase the EXW advantage. Rule of thumb: partial-air cap 10–20% of the batch preserves margin on most private label golf balls**.
- DDP vs CIF quick note: CIF leaves duty/tax to you at destination; DDP bundles customs/VAT clearance into supplier logistics. Use DDP if your team lacks import ops or you need guaranteed landed pricing; use CIF if you control brokerage and want flexibility.
How duty and origin (US/EU) interact with CN/VN/TH choices
For the US (HS 950632, MFN 0%), focus on EXW + freight + time risk. For the EU, layer in duty; Vietnam or Thailand can pull even when box and ball EXWs are close. Always confirm tariff at PO time; origin documentation must be clean to avoid post-clearance assessments. Split SKUs by duty sensitivity and launch cadence.
Risk buffer for peak season & fuel surcharges
Fuel and peak-season GRIs swing ocean by $0.10–0.25/box**. Build a risk buffer into landed-cost quotes, and lock sailings early for March–August deliveries. For air, watch DIM weight, surcharges, and capacity constraints during sports retail peaks. Maintain plan B** consolidations through ports with better schedule reliability.
Callout
- US HS 950632 MFN duty: 0%
- EU duty (often): ~2.7–4.7% (plus VAT; verify at order time)

Which country is more stable on lead time, replenishment, inserts, and MOQ?
China offers the best MOQ friendliness and insert-order flexibility; Thailand and Vietnam are highly stable inside brand ecosystems but less flexible for third-party OEM windows. Peak season (pre–Northern Hemisphere season) tightens all; China typically enables faster replenishment cycles.
Stability & peak season windows by country
China: plentiful OEMs, elastic scheduling, and accessory density (inks, plates, boxes) shorten cycle time. Vietnam: expanding, but ramp-up variability appears in some lines—plan buffer for first-time runs. Thailand: mature and stable, yet slots are tight—particularly on Tour lines where changeovers are booked far out.
Caption: Stability / replenishment / MOQ comparison (lead time in w; relative ratings)
| Dimension | China | Vietnam | Thailand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stability | ★★★★☆ (flexible, many OEMs) | ★★★☆☆ (ramp-up batches) | ★★★★☆ (mature but tight slots) |
| Peak | Mar–Aug; inserts negotiable | Similar; slower replenishment | Similar; inserts difficult (Tour lines) |
| Replenishment | 2-piece: 2–4w; PU: 4–6w | 3–5w / 6–8w | 3–5w / 6–9w |
| MOQ | Best (5k–10k/sku feasible) | Medium (10k–20k) | Higher (PU often 20k+) |

To keep replenishment reliable, agree on SLA markers: slot reservation windows, CTP variance, and allowable reject rates. Pre-approve artwork kits and plate libraries to shave days off repeats. For VN/TH, lock seasonal slots early if you rely on Tour-grade lines.
When should you keep orders in China vs shift to Vietnam/Thailand?
Keep in China for two-piece Surlyn, existing tooling, 10k–20k pcs or higher, sea freight, and fast inserts. Choose Thailand for Tour-grade urethane with strict consistency. Choose Vietnam when origin/tariff matters and your lead time is flexible enough to absorb setup and ramp windows.
Three-variable decision tree (volume × complexity × speed)
Think in three variables: volume, complexity, and speed. Low complexity and moderate volume with sea freight? China wins more often. High complexity (urethane, strict CTP) and committed volumes? Thailand earns its premium. If EU duty narrows gaps, or you want dual sourcing, Vietnam is a strong complement. Map SKUs against these axes and pre-define fallback factories per node.

Example decisions—10k vs 50k orders; US vs EU destination
-
10k, US, 2-piece, standard box, sea → China on EXW + inserts.
-
50k, EU, 3-layer urethane, sea → Thailand if Tour performance is critical; Vietnam if tariff helps and spec is mainstream.
-
10k, US, 3-layer urethane, air → Thailand if quality risk must be minimized; otherwise China high-spec line.
-
20k, EU, 2-piece, sea → China remains lowest if origin doesn’t change duty; Vietnam competitive if documentation reduces duty incidence.
Hybrid strategy—China mainline + VN/TH for specific SKUs
Many brands run a China mainline (2-piece Surlyn + mid urethane) and VN/TH for Tour SKUs or EU-sensitive lanes. This spreads tooling risk, sustains replenishment agility, and optimizes duty exposure by destination. When switching factories, preserve compression baselines, cover specs, and CTP test methods to avoid consumer-visible shifts.
Which Chinese OEMs cover 2-piece and 3-piece (including urethane) with friendly MOQs?
A set of Chinese OEMs covers 2/3/4-piece lines with MOQs from 1,000–5,000 pcs for trials and scalable capacity for 20k+ orders. In-house molds and shorter sampling cycles enable faster market entry, especially for private label golf balls.
Capability overview & trial-order pathways
Pilot 1k–5k runs validate printing, compression, and cover finish before committing to large volumes. Ask about tooling reuse, plate library, and QC documentation to accelerate second orders. Align on color limits, logo tolerances, and coating gloss to reduce remakes. For urgent launches, pre-book sampling slots and insist on dated approvals to keep the critical path visible.
Mold/tooling policies (fees, lead time, reuse)
Clarify dimple tooling fees and lead time upfront. Many factories enable reuse across SKUs with minor tweaks, lowering the effective cost per project once you hit 20k+ runs. Request CTP certificates, compression histograms, and random-drop tests per lot to ensure the production curve remains tight.
Caption: Chinese OEM short list (2-piece & 3-piece including urethane; MOQ in pcs)
| Company | Location | Capabilities | MOQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hangzhou Grasbird | Hangzhou, Zhejiang | Specializes in 2-piece Surlyn balls, also makes 3-piece balls | 3,000–5,000 pcs |
| Ningbo Golfara | Ningbo, Zhejiang | OEM for 2/3/4-piece balls, including urethane-covered models | from 1,000 pcs |
| MLG Sports | Xiamen, Fujian | Produces 2/3-piece balls (Surlyn & Urethane) | 2,000–3,000 pcs |
| Shenzhen Xinjintian | Shenzhen, Guangdong | Offers 2/3/4-piece balls; in-house mold & production lines | 2,000–3,000 pcs |
| Chengsheng Golf | Xiamen, Fujian | Mainly produces 2-piece Surlyn balls and 3-piece Urethane balls | from 2,000 pcs |
FAQ
When is China the lowest landed cost for golf balls?
For two-piece Surlyn at 10k–20k pcs with sea freight and standard packaging, China usually delivers the lowest landed cost.
China combines low EXW, friendly MOQs, and fast accessory turnaround (plates, boxes). For EU shipments, re-check duty/origin; Vietnam can close the gap when EXW is within ~$0.05–0.08/pc**** and lead time is flexible.
What EXW ranges apply at 20k units for two-piece vs three-layer?
Two-piece Surlyn: China $0.55–0.75, Vietnam $0.60–0.85, Thailand $0.65–0.90; Three-layer urethane: China $1.45–1.90, Vietnam $1.60–2.20, Thailand $1.70–2.40.
Expect China to be fastest at 25–40d for 2-piece and 45–70d for urethane. Vietnam and Thailand run 35–55/55–90d respectively. Premium finishes or tight CTP** targets extend run time.
How do duties differ for US vs EU on golf balls (HS 950632)?
US MFN duty is commonly 0% for HS 950632; EU duty often sits around 2.7–4.7%, plus VAT.
This difference matters: for EU, the duty line can flip close quotes in favor of Vietnam/Thailand when EXW gaps are small. Always verify the tariff schedule and origin at PO time.
What MOQ is realistic for 2-piece Surlyn private label?
China can often accept 5k–10k per SKU, while Vietnam is closer to 10k–20k, and Thailand higher for urethane.
Trial runs of 1k–5k are possible with select Chinese OEMs. Expect plate/setup fees to be amortized into unit price on very small batches. Use trials to confirm print quality and compression spread.
How long do molds and samples take for a new dimple pattern?
Plan several weeks for tooling and sampling—longer if you need testing in multiple compressions.
A new dimple tool can add 2–4 w** depending on queue and complexity. In-house machining and multi-cavity molds shorten cycles. Reuse of similar tooling helps both schedule and amortization.
How do peak seasons affect lead time and insert orders?
March–August tightens schedules across CN/VN/TH; China remains the most flexible for inserts and replenishment.
Reserve slots early for spring/summer sell-in. In Thailand, Tour lines are often pre-booked; inserts are hard. Vietnam’s ramp implies variable timing for replenishment. Build buffer weeks and consider partial air for continuity.
What packaging spec keeps color boxes under $0.40?
Use E/F single-wall insert + 157g coated paper, 4C + matte lamination, and minimize post-press effects.
China commonly hits $0.28–0.45/box at 1,000 box with 10–18d lead time. Spot UV, foil, or emboss increase cost and turn time. Pre-approve dielines and ink limits to avoid re-makes.
When does Thailand beat China for Tour-grade urethane?
When yield stability, cover uniformity, and CTP consistency matter more than EXW differences.
Premium lines in Thailand reduce rework and holdbacks, giving predictable lots. If your brand promise hinges on Tour-level feel and flight, Thailand’s cluster justifies the higher EXW with fewer quality surprises.
Does Vietnam’s origin help EU-bound orders after duties?
Yes—when EXW gaps are small and documentation supports lower duty exposure.
In the EU, duty plus VAT change the math. If Vietnam’s EXW is within ~$0.05–0.08/pc**, origin can push it ahead. Confirm origin rules, keep supplier declarations current, and model landed cost** per corridor.
How to negotiate SLA: yield %, replenish cycle, and price ladders?
Define yield KPIs by SKU, set replenish lead times by season, and commit to volume ladders for price breaks.
Align on CTP variance, compression spread, and allowable reject rate. Pre-book seasonal windows for inserts, and plan 20k/50k/100k commitments to unlock better EXW and priority.
Conclusion
China still holds a conditional cost advantage in 2025—most clearly for two-piece Surlyn at 10k–20k pcs with sea freight and standard packaging. For Tour-grade urethane, Thailand’s maturity delivers premium performance at a higher EXW, while Vietnam balances cost with origin/duty advantages. Best practice is to model landed cost and time risk per corridor, then dual-source where it strengthens availability and margin.
You might also like — How to Negotiate Lead Time with Chinese Golf Ball Manufacturers?




