Top 4-piece Urethane Golf Ball Manufacturers in China (2025)

map of China showing 4-piece urethane golf ball export hubs in Xiamen and Ningbo

Top China sources for 4-piece urethane golf balls (cast urethane, USGA-conforming): Xiamen MLG (~2,000 MOQ), Ningbo Golfara (1,000–2,000), Ningbo Yihong (3,000+), and Xiamen Yopral (1,000–3,000). Typical timelines: samples 7–12 days; mass production 15–35 days.

Which Chinese factories make 4-piece urethane golf balls?

China’s 4-piece urethane golf ball manufacturing is led by Xiamen and Ningbo within the Fujian–Zhejiang coastal corridor; best-fit OEMs for small-to-mid MOQs are Xiamen MLG (~2,000), Ningbo Golfara (1,000–2,000), Ningbo Yihong (3,000+), and Xiamen Yopral (1,000–3,000). Samples 7–12 days; mass production 15–35 days.

Factories Shortlist Manufacturer Main product types Typical MOQ Best for
Ningbo Golfara 2/3/4-piece; cast urethane; custom colors/logos 1,000–2,000 15–20 days Small-MOQ premium, pilot runs
Xiamen MLG 2/3/4/5-piece; urethane/Surlyn ~2,000 20–35 days Mid-volume with tight schedule
Ningbo Yihong 2/3/4-piece; cast urethane or TPU (confirm per SKU) 3,000+ 15–30 days Price-tiered premium lines
Xiamen Yopral 2/3/4-piece; urethane cover 1,000–3,000 15–25 days Event balls, white-label premium

✔ True — Finishing (coatings/printing/packaging) drives both price and schedule

The same core/mantle build can add $0.05–0.15 per ball and 5–10 working days if you specify double coats, UV, multi-color pad printing, or gift boxes.

✘ False — “Core design is the only determinant of cost and lead time”

Bottlenecks are typically paint/print lanes and kitting, not molding.

OEM golf balls undergoing coating and pad printing in cleanroom facility

Why pick a 4-piece urethane model?

A 4-piece urethane golf ball decouples driver speed (core + inner mantle) from wedge spin (outer mantle + urethane cover), yielding higher launch stability and stronger greenside control for mid-to-high swing speeds; it positions against tour-class lines like Titleist Pro V1x and TaylorMade TP5x intent class.

Who benefits most from 4-piece urethane—and when does 3-piece win?

Choose a 4-piece urethane for tournament SKUs, players chasing consistent stopping power, and premium retail lines; pick 3-piece urethane for broader audience coverage at lower cost and softer overall feel.

  • 4-piece: higher speed ceiling, tighter wind stability, stronger wedge bite.

  • 3-piece: all-rounder feel, friendly price, easier compression matching for mid-speed players.

3-piece vs 4-piece urethane — materials, process, performance, use cases

A 4-piece adds an outer mantle to decouple low driver spin from high wedge spin, raising greenside control and wind stability versus 3-piece at a higher unit cost.

Dimension 3-piece urethane 4-piece urethane
Typical structure PB core + single mantle + urethane cover (cast or TPU) PB core + inner mantle (speed) + outer mantle (spin/flight) + urethane cover
Cover route Cast urethane common; some TPU High-end is almost always cast; small share TPU
Tuning freedom Medium (mantle + cover thickness/hardness) High (dual mantles decouple driver low-spin vs wedge high-spin)
Feel & spin Soft feel; strong vs Surlyn; all-rounder Strongest greenside spin; faster stopping
Ball speed & flight Mid-high speed; neutral trajectory Higher speed ceiling; higher peak; better wind stability
Cost Lower Higher (extra mantle, tighter concentricity control)
Primary users Moderate swing speeds Mid-to-high swing speeds; tournament play
Typical uses Retail, amateur tournaments, club balls High-end retail, events, tour-style; Practice/X-Out for training

✔ True — Extra mantle and tighter concentricity make 4-piece cadence slower

Expect slightly longer cycles and more disciplined scrap management versus 3-piece due to dual mantles and stricter thickness tolerances across the urethane cover.

✘ False — “Layer count doesn’t affect schedule”

Layering precision directly impacts throughput and rework rates in any 4-piece urethane production line.

engineers analyzing spin and flight data for urethane golf balls

How is a 4-piece urethane ball built and controlled?

The buyer-visible stack is PB core → inner mantle (speed) → outer mantle (spin/trajectory) → urethane cover (usually cast), then finishing (paint/print) and full cosmetic inspection; control depends on CT/COR, compression, roundness, and cover uniformity.

Essential build stages and checkpoints

Compound the PB core and vulcanize; measure compression and COR; wrap inner then outer mantles; form the cover via cast urethane or TPU; then de-flash, polish, coat, print, and cure—verifying metrics pre- and post-paint.

  • Pre-paint QC: weight, diameter, roundness, CT, COR, compression.

  • Post-paint QC: 100% appearance check + AQL; traceability by mold/dimple codes.

  • Traceability: retain samples per lot; record dimple-mold IDs and coating stacks.

✔ True — What makes a factory audit truly meaningful

A proper audit includes on-site process review, past defect data, capacity verification, and social compliance checks. It improves predictions on delivery reliability and quality stability.

✘ False — “As long as they passed one audit, they’re good”

A one-time pass doesn’t guarantee ongoing standards; continuous control and follow-ups matter.

golf ball quality control with compression and diameter testing in lab

What do “Practice” and “X-Out” labels actually mean?

Practice-marked/X-Out units are the same 4-piece urethane construction with cosmetic blemishes—not range-ball builds; use them for value training while preserving tour-level construction and performance.

Categorize the three families clearly

Separate three categories: Practice-marked/X-Out, conforming retail/play balls, and true range balls; only the first two share 4-piece urethane construction—range balls are usually 1–2 piece Surlyn with different durability goals.

  • Practice-marked/X-Out: minor paint/print blemishes; conforming performance.

  • Retail/play balls: full-grade finish; marketed SKUs.

  • Range balls: 1–2 piece Surlyn; built for abuse and low cost, not greenside spin.

Channel guidance for accurate messaging

Reserve 4-piece urethane builds for retail and tournament lines; offer Practice-marked/X-Out for consumer training value; supply ranges and academies with 2-piece Surlyn to protect budgets and ball life.

✔ True — “Practice-marked” is cosmetic grading, not different construction

Performance remains conforming; stamps typically indicate minor aesthetic issues and discounted pricing for the same 4-piece urethane build.

✘ False — “Practice-stamped equals range-ball spec”

Range balls are built for durability and low cost; they are almost always Surlyn and fewer layers.

comparison of 4-piece urethane and 2-piece surlyn golf balls for retail and practice

Cast urethane vs TPU for 4-piece urethane golf balls

Choose cast urethane for tour-grade greenside spin and feel; consider TPU when cycle time and cost are priorities—validate with like-for-like A/B builds at your target compression.

Core trade-offs: cast urethane vs TPU

Cast urethane (thermoset) typically delivers higher wedge bite and softer feel; TPU (thermoplastic) accelerates cycles and can simplify color shells; pick by SKU intent: flagship tournament vs budget-sensitive quick turns.

Criterion Cast urethane (thermoset) TPU (thermoplastic)
Greenside spin/“grab” Highest; tour-class feel Slightly lower bite
Cycle time Slower (mix, cast, cure) Faster (injection/press)
Durability vs wedges Excellent; softer feel Very good; different scuff pattern
Color shells Standard white; planned colors Color shells easier at scale
Best use Flagship/tournament lines Budget/time-driven runs

Validate a TPU alternative without surprises

Run a controlled A/B in which cores and mantles are identical and only the cover route changes; measure wedge spin, abrasion, CT/COR parity, thickness mapping/Cpk, and collect blind-panel feedback at your target compression.

✔ True — Most premium 4-piece offerings default to cast urethane

If greenside spin and feel are non-negotiable, cast remains the safe default; TPU is a pragmatic alternative for cycle-time and cost gains.

✘ False — “TPU equals cast across every performance metric”

Expect subtle but real differences in wedge interactions; verify via controlled builds.

Quality metrics & acceptance criteria

Set USGA/R&A size and weight windows in the PO and require histograms for CT/COR and compression; define cosmetic AQL by defect class to avoid disputes and rework.

Acceptance matrix

Metric Method Target window Notes
Diameter Caliper/gauge ≥ 42.67 mm USGA conforming
Weight Scale ≤ 45.93 g USGA conforming
Roundness Roundness gauge Tolerance & Cpk Concentricity focus
Compression Compression gauge Model-specific range Align gauges with supplier
CT/COR CT rig/COR test Buyer targets (driver) Include histograms
Wedge spin Robot/fixture test Delta by build Keep cores/mantles constant
Cosmetics Visual/AQL AQL plan by class Mis-reg, orange peel, dust nibs

Packaging options

Fold-flat 3-ball sleeves and 12-ball cartons minimize CBM for air/express while preserving retail readiness; tubes/blisters increase CBM and should be reserved for niche visual displays.

Packaging & CBM effects (choose by lane and budget)

Option Retail readiness CBM effect Pros Cons Best for
Fold-flat sleeves + 12-ball carton High after assembly Low Lowest air cost; flexible storage Some destination assembly Air/express, small MOQs
Pre-assembled sleeves/cartons Immediate Medium Faster fulfillment Higher CBM Sea freight, larger runs
Tubes/blisters Niche High Visual impact Poor CBM; costly by air Specialty retail only
Gift boxes (inserts) Premium Medium–High Brand value Kitting time and cost Events/premium sets

Logistics tips to cut freight:

  • Model dimensional weight before locking packaging.

  • Avoid tubes/blisters for air; compress void space in master cartons.

  • Split-ship: balls first, gift sets later, when timelines diverge.

  • Confirm pallet plan (sets per carton; cartons per pallet) for sea freight.

✔ True — Model landed cost per dozen including CBM and air-lane realities

Freight is volume-driven. Tubes/blisters inflate CBM and can outweigh material savings; fold-flat sleeves/dozens compress volume for air/express. Compare sea vs air and lock the format only after a total landed-cost simulation.

✘ False — “Lowest EXW unit price wins regardless of freight”

Ignoring CBM and dimensional weight creates budget overruns. Volume, not grams, usually decides your real cost.

4-piece urethane golf balls being packed in retail cartons for export

FAQs

Can a 4-piece urethane be used as a range ball?

No. A 4-piece urethane golf ball is a competition-grade construction and too costly for range abuse; supply ranges with 1–2 piece Surlyn. Practice-marked/X-Out 4-piece units are fine for personal training but not range buckets.

Repeated wedge strikes and mat hits create a different wear pattern from real play. Protect budgets and ball life: use Surlyn for ranges; keep urethane for play or personal practice.

Is TPU “worse” than cast urethane?

It’s a trade-off, not a downgrade. TPU can shorten cycles and reduce cost, but cast urethane typically wins on groove-grab and feel. Validate TPU via controlled A/Bs keeping cores and mantles constant.

If your SKU targets premium retail or tournament play, cast urethane remains the safer default for flagship 4-piece urethane golf ball SKUs. TPU helps for cost-sensitive or quick-turn projects; confirm wedge-spin, abrasion, and cover-thickness Cpk before locking.

What delays shipments most?

Finishing lines and kitting, especially in Q2–Q3 peaks. Pre-approve coating stacks, consolidate pad-print colors, and confirm gift-box capacity—or ship balls first and kits later.

Molding is rarely the bottleneck. Your timeline is set by paint booths, print fixtures, and pack-out speed. A small up-front alignment often saves a week downstream.

What are typical MOQs and timelines?

MOQs commonly range 1,000–3,000; samples take 7–12 days; mass production runs 15–35 days for a 4-piece urethane program depending on finishing lanes and packaging decisions.

Targets hold if SKUs stay on standard whites and 332 tools. Neon shells, multi-color prints, or UV coats push you to the high end of the window. Lock art and Pantones early.

How do we reduce airfreight on small drops?

Use fold-flat sleeves, minimize void space in master cartons, and split-ship if gift boxes aren’t critical to first-delivery; always model dimensional weight before finalizing packaging.

A simple CBM model often finds 8–15% savings without any compromise on consumer-facing quality.

Key takeaway

China’s 4-piece urethane OEMs—MLG, Golfara, Yihong, and Yopral—can deliver tour-level builds at small-to-mid MOQs if you lock cover route, compression targets, finishing specs, and packaging early; plan on 7–12 day samples and 15–35 day mass production to hit retail windows confidently.

You might also like — Top 3-Piece Urethane Golf Ball Manufacturers in China (2025)

Share this post:

Have any questions?

We will contact you within 1 working day

Start Quote

We will contact you within 12 hours, please pay attention to the email with the suffix “@golfara.com”